Overview
- The European Court of Human Rights ruled that Sir Philip Green's rights to privacy and a fair trial were not breached when Lord Hain named him in Parliament in 2018 under parliamentary privilege.
- The court emphasized that the regulation of parliamentary privilege is a matter for the UK Parliament, reaffirming its autonomy and rejecting the need for external controls.
- Sir Philip Green had argued that the use of privilege to disclose information protected by an injunction undermined his legal rights and violated the European Convention on Human Rights.
- The case stems from allegations of misconduct, including sexual harassment and bullying, which Green has denied, and his subsequent use of non-disclosure agreements to prevent public disclosure.
- The ruling has reignited political debate in the UK over the influence of European human rights law on national sovereignty and parliamentary freedom.