Particle.news

Download on the App Store

EPA Administrator Defends Deep Budget Cuts in Heated Senate Hearing

Lee Zeldin faced sharp criticism over a 55% funding reduction, grant cancellations, and environmental program eliminations under the Trump administration's 2026 budget proposal.

Sen. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., from left, speaks as House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., and Sen. Cory Booker D-N.J., listen during a live-streamed conversation on the steps of the Capitol, Sunday, April 27, 2025, in Washington. (AP Photo/Manuel Balce Ceneta)
FILE - EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin speaks during a cabinet meeting at the White House, April 30, 2025, in Washington. (AP Photo/Evan Vucci, File)
Lee Zeldin, Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) testifies before the Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works during a hearing regarding President Trump's budget request for the agency in Washington DC, on Wednesday, May 21, 2025. President Trump's budget proposal for the EPA calls for more than a 50 percent cut in the budget from last year's.
Image

Overview

  • The Trump administration's 2026 budget proposes slashing EPA funding by $4.5 billion, reducing staffing to 1980s levels and eliminating key programs like Energy Star and environmental justice initiatives.
  • Administrator Lee Zeldin defended the cuts as a crackdown on waste, stating that multiple employees reviewed the nearly 800 canceled grants totaling $2 billion, though Democrats challenged the integrity of the review process.
  • Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse accused Zeldin of providing conflicting accounts about grant reviews, citing Justice Department filings that contradicted Zeldin's claims of personal involvement.
  • Sen. Adam Schiff warned that the budget cuts would increase pollution, contaminate water supplies, and lead to higher rates of cancer and other illnesses, calling Zeldin's actions a threat to public health.
  • Zeldin argued that the cuts reflect taxpayer priorities and accused Democrats of prioritizing political attacks over addressing waste and abuse in environmental spending.