Particle.news

Download on the App Store

Federal Judges Block Key Sections of Trump’s Retaliatory Orders Against Law Firms

Trump's executive orders targeting firms linked to his political adversaries face mounting legal setbacks as some firms strike deals while others continue to fight in court.

Student protesters gather inside their encampment on the Columbia University campus in April 2024 in New York.
U.S. President Donald Trump speaks as he signs executive orders in the Oval Office of the White House on March 06, 2025 in Washington, DC. President Trump signed a series of executive orders, including lifting 25% tariffs for all goods compliant under USMCA trade agreement, terminating the security clearances of those who work at the law firm Perkins Coie, combating drug trafficking at the northern border as well as announcing a $20 billion investment by shipping giant CMA CGM for U.S. infrastructure and jobs.
Image
President Donald Trump arrives on Air Force One at Palm Beach International Airport, Friday, March 28, 2025, in West Palm Beach, Fla. (AP Photo/Manuel Balce Ceneta)

Overview

  • Federal judges issued temporary restraining orders halting significant parts of Trump's executive orders against Jenner & Block and WilmerHale, citing likely constitutional violations.
  • Trump's actions, which include revoking security clearances and restricting federal access, are widely seen as retaliation against firms tied to investigations or litigation against him.
  • Paul Weiss and Skadden Arps have struck deals with the administration, committing to pro bono work totaling $140 million, while facing criticism for undermining legal independence.
  • The legal community remains divided, with some firms resisting Trump's orders in court and others capitulating under financial and reputational pressures.
  • Trump's broader pattern of targeting perceived adversaries, including universities and media organizations, has raised concerns about the erosion of free speech and legal norms.