Judge Deliberates Google's Fate in Landmark Antitrust Trial
The U.S. government argues Google's contracts with companies like Apple create an illegal monopoly, while Google defends its market dominance as a result of superior service.
- Google's antitrust trial concludes with arguments focusing on its dominance as a search engine and the legality of its business practices.
- Justice Department claims Google's contracts, particularly with Apple, unfairly restrict competition in the search engine market.
- Google defends its position, arguing that its search engine's prevalence is due to its effectiveness and consumer preference.
- The trial, presided over by Judge Amit Mehta, marks the most significant antitrust case in over two decades.
- A decision from Judge Mehta is expected in the coming months, which could lead to significant changes in the tech industry.





























