Particle.news

Download on the App Store

Judge Excludes Howden’s Text Message From Sexual-Assault Trial of Ex-World Juniors

The decision leaves prosecutors without what they called critical corroboration in a trial now focused on witness credibility.

Image
The defence team for Dillon Dubé, one of the accused men, questions a witness as Justice Maria Carroccia listens on.
Ottawa Senators' Alex Formenton during an NHL hockey game in Philadelphia, on April 29, 2022; New Jersey Devils defenceman Cal Foote before an NHL hockey game in Newark, N.J., on Oct. 27, 2023; New Jersey Devils' Michael McLeod during an NHL hockey game in Philadelphia, on Nov. 30, 2023; Calgary Flames centre Dillon Dube during an NHL hockey game in Detroit, on Oct. 22, 202, and Philadelphia Flyers goaltender Carter Hart during an NHL hockey game in Uniondale, N.Y., on April 3, 2021. The five players from Canada's 2018 world junior hockey team are facing sexual assault charges. THE CANADIAN PRESS/AP-Matt Slocum, Noah K. Murray, Matt Slocum, Paul Sancya, Corey Sipkin
Nick Cake is a former Crown attorney and current criminal defence lawyer who's keeping a close eye on the case.

Overview

  • Justice Maria Carroccia ruled Brett Howden’s June 26, 2018 text describing a teammate’s alleged slap on the complainant’s buttocks fails the principled hearsay exception.
  • Defence lawyers completed cross-examination of Howden by videolink on May 27 as the trial under a judge-alone format prepares to hear retired London police sergeant Steve Newton.
  • The five accused—Michael McLeod, Alex Formenton, Carter Hart, Dillon Dube and Callan Foote—have pleaded not guilty to non-consensual sexual acts alleged to have followed consensual sex in a London, Ont., hotel room on June 19, 2018.
  • Howden, now with the Vegas Golden Knights, has testified that he cannot recall many details of that night and has faced scrutiny over security video showing him dancing with the complainant and earlier statements to investigators.
  • The exclusion of the text marked the Crown’s final evidence challenge after earlier applications under past recollection and hearsay rules were rejected, setting back its strategy.