Judge Rejects Trump's Immunity Claim in Hush Money Conviction Appeal
The court ruled that Trump's actions tied to falsifying business records were personal and not protected as official presidential acts.
- Judge Juan Merchan dismissed Donald Trump's appeal to overturn his Manhattan criminal conviction for falsifying business records related to hush money payments.
- The judge ruled that Trump's actions, including signing checks and filing a government ethics form, fell outside the scope of presidential immunity as they were personal rather than official acts.
- Testimonies from former aides Hope Hicks and Madeleine Westerhout were deemed inadmissible for immunity claims, as they pertained to unofficial conduct.
- The court determined that Trump's tweets and Michael Cohen's testimony also did not qualify as protected presidential acts under the Supreme Court's immunity framework.
- Legal experts view the Manhattan case as an exception among Trump's legal challenges, with other cases dismissed or stalled following his re-election last month.
















































































