Particle.news

Download on the App Store

Key Evidence Gaps Highlighted in Karen Read Retrial Testimony

Forensic and medical experts testify on untested blood samples and undetermined cause of death as defense presses conspiracy claims.

Langdell Hall, Harvard Law School Library, building exterior, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA. (Photo by: Spencer Grant/GHI/UCG/Universal Images Group via Getty Images)
Image
Image
Image

Overview

  • Forensic scientist Maureen Hartnett testified that blood evidence collected in red Solo cups was never tested, raising questions about evidence handling.
  • Hartnett also detailed vehicle damage on Karen Read’s SUV, including a broken taillight, scratches, and dents, but could not confirm when the damage occurred.
  • Medical examiner Dr. Irini Scordi-Bello testified that John O’Keefe died from head trauma and hypothermia but could not determine whether the manner of death was accidental, homicidal, or otherwise.
  • The defense continues to argue that Read is the victim of a framing conspiracy, alleging that O’Keefe was fatally injured by another law enforcement officer at the party.
  • This retrial follows a 2024 mistrial and has focused on forensic gaps, ambiguous evidence, and competing narratives about O’Keefe’s death.