Massachusetts Trials Uber, Lyft Over Driver Classification
State attorney general argues ride-share companies misclassify drivers to avoid employee benefits, potentially costing millions in penalties.
- Non-jury trial examines whether Uber and Lyft drivers should be classified as employees under state law.
- The case is part of a broader national debate on the status of app-based gig workers.
- Uber and Lyft claim their business models rely on drivers being independent contractors for flexibility.
- Massachusetts' highest court is also reviewing a ballot measure to let voters decide drivers' status.
- The state alleges Uber and Lyft avoided paying $266.4 million in worker-related benefits over 10 years.