Meta Accused of Censoring Pro-Palestine Content
Human Rights Watch alleges over 1,000 instances of unjust content removal or restriction, calls for greater transparency in Meta's moderation policies.
- Human Rights Watch has accused Meta of censoring pro-Palestine content, alleging that over 1,000 pieces of content were unjustly removed or restricted in October and November 2023.
- Meta's alleged censorship includes removal of posts, disabling of accounts, and restrictions on user engagement with content.
- Human Rights Watch criticizes Meta's Dangerous Organizations and Individuals policy, arguing it suppresses discussion around Israel and Palestine.
- Meta has defended its policies, stating that it aims to protect speech related to the Israel-Hamas conflict and that it does not deliberately suppress any particular voice.
- Human Rights Watch calls for Meta to improve transparency and consistency in its content moderation policies, and to be more open about government requests to remove or restrict content.