NYPD Criticized for Failing to Punish Officers in Stop-and-Frisk Violations

A federal report reveals systemic leniency towards NYPD officers who conduct unconstitutional stop-and-frisks, undermining efforts to curb the practice.

A 503-page report by retired Judge James Yates highlights the NYPD's failure to adequately discipline officers for illegal stop-and-frisks.
The report shows that penalties for stop-and-frisk violations are rare and often reduced or dismissed, even when misconduct is substantiated.
The NYPD's internal disciplinary process is criticized for prioritizing 'good faith' or 'lack of mal-intention' over constitutional adherence.
The report calls for increased transparency and accountability, including publicizing disciplinary procedures and outcomes for stop-and-frisk violations.
Despite a court ruling deeming the practice unconstitutional in 2013, stop-and-frisk incidents have risen in recent years, disproportionately affecting Black and Hispanic communities.