Overview
- The Supreme Court announced it could not hear Baker v. Coates after five justices recused themselves, citing potential conflicts of interest.
- Justices Barrett, Gorsuch, Jackson, and Sotomayor recused due to financial ties with Penguin Random House, a party in the case, while Alito’s reason remains unclear.
- The lack of a quorum means the lower court’s dismissal of Ralph W. Baker Jr.’s plagiarism claims against Ta-Nehisi Coates will stand.
- This marks the third instance of recusals since the Court adopted a voluntary ethics code in November 2023, which lacks binding enforcement mechanisms.
- The recusals have reignited calls for greater judicial transparency and stronger ethics rules, as public scrutiny of financial conflicts continues to grow.