Supreme Court Overturns Chevron Doctrine, Shifts Power to Courts
The recent ruling ends decades of judicial deference to administrative agencies' interpretations of ambiguous statutes.
- The Chevron Doctrine, established in 1984, allowed courts to defer to agencies' reasonable interpretations of ambiguous laws.
- A 6-3 Supreme Court decision now requires courts to independently interpret these statutes, without defaulting to agency expertise.
- Critics argue this shift will lead to increased judicial involvement in technical regulatory matters and potential gridlock.
- Supporters believe the ruling restores legislative authority and ensures agencies do not overstep their bounds.
- The decision's long-term impact on federal regulations and administrative law remains uncertain.

























