Supreme Court Weighs Constitutionality of Tennessee’s Ban on Transgender Medical Care for Minors
The case could set a precedent affecting similar laws in 24 other states and reshape legal interpretations of sex discrimination and parental rights.
- The U.S. Supreme Court heard arguments in United States v. Skrmetti, a case challenging Tennessee's ban on gender-affirming medical treatments for minors.
- The central legal question is whether the ban violates the 14th Amendment's Equal Protection Clause by discriminating based on sex or transgender status.
- Advocates for the law argue it protects minors from irreversible medical interventions, while opponents claim it infringes on parental rights and discriminates against transgender youth.
- A majority of justices appeared skeptical of arguments equating the ban with unconstitutional sex-based discrimination, signaling a potential ruling in favor of Tennessee's law.
- The decision, expected in June 2025, could have wide-reaching implications for transgender rights and the regulation of medical care for minors across the United States.