Particle.news
Public Opinion Public Perception Public Figures Media Influence Partisan Politics Public Reactions Democracy Election Integrity Public Reaction Violence in Politics Public Safety Public Policy Conspiracy Theories Public Trust Right-Wing Politics Public Statements Freedom of Speech Democratic Party Public Engagement Rhetoric Public Sentiment Election Campaigns Misinformation Populism Partisanship Free Speech Election Interference Political Polarization Civic Engagement Media Coverage Polarization Debate Dynamics Debate Democratic Values Censorship Divisive Rhetoric Freedom of Expression Civility in Politics Disinformation Gender Issues Bipartisanship Public Speeches Far-Right Politics Far-Right Movements Racism Campaign Strategies Authoritarianism Public Protests Campaign Rhetoric Extremism Social Media Party Politics Violence in Society Voter Engagement Debates Voter Sentiment Racism in Politics Political Rhetoric Unity Youth Engagement Coalition Politics Judicial Activism Conservative Movement Historical Context Migration Policy Controversial Figures Racism and Sexism in Politics Party Dynamics Constitutional Crisis Public Officials Extreme Right Politics Party Unity Media Ethics Nationalism Conservatism Public Accountability Name-Calling Democratic Processes Conservative Views Hate Speech Migration Issues Leftist Politics Family Dynamics Rhetoric in Politics Violence and Society Celebrity Influence Debate Culture Partisan Division Civic Responsibility Political Violence Public Outrage Government Accountability Election Strategies Radicalism Media Consumption Opposition Parties Right-Wing Movements Media Representation Judicial Independence Public Debate
The bill, introduced by five Republican state senators, seeks to classify the controversial term in state mental health statutes, prompting criticism from Democrats.
