First Amendment Censorship Political Speech Legal Challenges Social Media Regulation Regulatory Compliance Retaliation Digital Rights National Security Social Media Regulatory Issues Due Process Age Verification Litigation Adult Entertainment Regulation of Speech Media Rights Privacy Rights Press Rights Age Verification Laws Encouraging Illegal Immigration Regulatory Powers Overbreadth Doctrine Legal Cases Campaign Finance Business Services LGBT Rights Employment Law Medical Professionals Social Media Regulations Legal Standards Regulatory Practices Drag Performances National Security Law Corporate Rights Internet Regulation Regulatory Action Age-Verification Laws Online Content Regulation Obscenity Adult Content Regulation Technology Law Data Privacy Regulations Executive Orders Executive Authority Anti-Discrimination Political Intimidation Higher Education Content Moderation Election Law Civil Liberties Boycotts Judicial Review Implications Drag Shows Corporate Free Speech Restriction State Bans Montana Law Regulatory Authority Conversion Therapy License Plates Vanity Plates Schenck v. U.S. Political Protests Legislative Expulsion Limits on Free Speech Abortion Pill "Reversal" Treatment University Policies Challenges to Tech Legislation Protests and Free Speech Legislative Conduct Legislative Privileges Campus Free Speech Abortion Rights Government Regulations Viewpoint Discrimination Academic Freedom Parental Rights Court Rulings Civil Rights Legislative Ethics Immigration Law Noncitizens' Rights Rights of Individuals Legal Representation Political Prosecution Government Overreach Gag Orders Government Coercion Violations Social Media Platforms Public Schools Supervised Release Student Rights Supreme Court Cases Press Freedom Judicial Decisions
The court ruled that the Justice Department’s cancellation of $3.2 million in grants violated the First Amendment by punishing the ABA for its criticism of the Trump administration.