Reform Employee Rights Leadership Appointments Public Administration Federal Workforce Federal Employees Cabinet Secretary IAS Officers Political Appointees Accountability Bureaucracy Personnel Management Job Quotas Civil Servants Employment Law Job Quota System Indian Administrative Service Workforce Management Political Appointments Advisory Roles Employment Issues Staff Changes Management Transparency Recruitment Process Administrative Procedure Act Recruitment Civil Defense Volunteers Senior Officials Reforms Trust Criticism Public Trust Employment Job Cuts Public Servants Ethics in Government Brexit Foreign Office Workforce Planning Employment Authority Transition of Power Employment Policy Career Employees Merit-Based Hiring Merit-Based Employment Promotions Employee Buyouts Employee Protections Personnel Changes Authoritarianism Diversity Initiatives Police Unions Employee Compensation Performance Management F.B.I. Officials Federal Judges Employee Relations Employee Morale Senior Civil Servants Workforce Protections Probationary Employees Agency Operations Nonpartisan Workers Office of Personnel Management Employment Ethics Procurement Administrative Functions Budget Cuts Job Reductions Public Sector Veterans Affairs Investigations Political Interference NICS Membership Rules Cabinet Office Extremism Regulations IAS Transfers Policy Changes Employment Policies UPSC Examination All India Services Public Discourse Cyber Bullying Librarianship AGMUT Cadre Departmental Reforms Equality Data Integrity Defense Spending Political Advisers Tax Claims Political Debates Impartiality Home Office Political Attacks Protests
A proposed rule could make it easier to dismiss federal statisticians, raising concerns about the politicization of economic data critical to U.S. policy and market stability.